Search for: All records

Prostate cancer prognostication largely relies on visual assessment of a few thinly sectioned biopsy specimens under a microscope to assign a Gleason grade group (GG). Unfortunately, the assigned GG is not always associated with a patient’s outcome in part because of the limited sampling of spatially heterogeneous tumors achieved by 2-dimensional histopathology. In this study, open-top light-sheet microscopy was used to obtain 3-dimensional pathology data sets that were assessed by 4 human readers. Intrabiopsy variability was assessed by asking readers to perform Gleason grading of 5 different levels per biopsy for a total of 20 core needle biopsies (ie, 100 total images). Intrabiopsy variability (Cohen k) was calculated as the worst pairwise agreement in GG between individual levels within each biopsy and found to be 0.34, 0.34, 0.38, and 0.43 for the 4 pathologists. These preliminary results reveal that even within a 1-mm-diameter needle core, GG based on 2-dimensional images can vary dramatically depending on the location within a biopsy being analyzed. We believe that morphologic assessment of whole biopsies in 3 dimension has the potential to enable more reliable and consistent tumor grading. 

Abstract In recent years, technological advances in tissue preparation, high‐throughput volumetric microscopy, and computational infrastructure have enabled rapid developments in nondestructive 3D pathology, in which high‐resolution histologic datasets are obtained from thick tissue specimens, such as whole biopsies, without the need for physical sectioning onto glass slides. While 3D pathology generates massive datasets that are attractive for automated computational analysis, there is also a desire to use 3D pathology to improve the visual assessment of tissue histology. In this perspective, we discuss and provide examples of potential advantages of 3D pathology for the visual assessment of clinical specimens and the challenges of dealing with large 3D datasets (of individual or multiple specimens) that pathologists have not been trained to interpret. We discuss the need for artificial intelligence triaging algorithms and explainable analysis methods to assist pathologists or other domain experts in the interpretation of these novel, often complex, large datasets.